|
BAYAN TALK:
"Institutionalizing Government
Dialogue With The Governed"
UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES |
|
Government Lending a
Caring “Ear” and an Open “Mind”
|
| Addressing the needs and aspirations of the poor should ideally begin with the government lending a caring ear and an open mind to the sectors in need. However, there is no mechanism for sectors of society, especially the unorganized poor, to dialogue regularly with government officials. Often, it is only when grievances are aired in media that the heads or senior officials of government entities pay attention to the complaining citizens, often in a defensive, adversarial mode. And needy people who do not get media attention never get to dialogue at all. The transacting public is the target sector who avails of government services. Government retains countless stakeholders and beneficiaries. Anyone requiring the services of government is considered a government stakeholder. Potentially, the stakeholders are in effect the entire population of 88 million Filipinos |
Bayan Talk is “People Talk” |
Bayan Talk (literally, “People Talk”) aims to fill this governance vacuum by convening regular dialogues between government agencies or local government units, and the constituencies they serve, to promote understanding, greater government responsiveness, and the monitoring of government services and integrity through people’s organizations. Where the poor are not yet organized, Bayan Talk will also spur the formation of groups to dialogue with concerned state bodies. |
Government-Citizenry dialogues would also
serve to address weaknesses of the bureaucracy |
The enhanced government-citizenry dialogues would also serve to address weaknesses of the bureaucracy in a number of critical areas. Government systems and procedures are less efficient, less flexible and tend to be more on compliance with the rules rather than providing greater space in achieving results and productivity. In many state agencies and instrumentalities, public service delivery has become overly complex and highly susceptible to red tape, thus reducing the atmosphere for the culture of customer service to evolve. The apparatuses for accountability seldom work and programs on anti-corruption fall short of expectation either because of the lack of political will or no serious implementation. By harnessing both the leading personnel agency of the government and the collective eyes, ears and tongues of countless people’s groups, agencies and local government units (LGUs) can be pressed to be more attentive and responsive to the real needs and aspirations of citizens. |
A wealth of information and peoples’ expectations and aspirations to be generated and documented which in turn
can form the basis for a collective government action |
Through the stakeholders’ dialogue, a wealth of information and peoples’ expectations and aspirations shall be generated and documented which in turn can form the basis for a collective government action. Invariably, these government actions shall be converted into government pieces of legislation, executive fiats and directives, agencies’ improved systems and procedures (e.g., Citizens’ Charter, generic charters) and other socio-economic packages, among others. |
Improving the lives of the people is one of the most fundamental aims of governance |
| Improving the lives of the people is one of the most fundamental aims of governance. Socio-economic and political governance is closely linked with overall administrative governance. Essentially, administrative governance involves people and resources that ensure the delivery of public services. Without people and resources, government operations are immobilized and public services become out-of-way. Particularly for the poor, it is oftentimes more difficult to access basic government services much less benefit from them. |
 |